RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04295
XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty, with a Reentry (RE) code that would allow him
to reenlist.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not issued a DD Form 214 because he was discharged prior
to attending basic training due to officer positions not being
available.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Reserve Order Number 023, dated 17 Dec 03, the
applicant was relieved from his assignment and discharged from
the Air Force Reserve effective 23 Nov 03.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. Per AFI 36-3202, Separation
Documents, Section B, paragraph 2.2.3, the DD Form 214 provides
the separating members with brief, clear records of their active
military service at the time they are transferred, released,
discharged or retired. The applicant has not provided any
documents proving he was ever placed in an active status
rendering him eligible to receive a DD Form 214. As the
applicant stated, he was discharged from the Air Force prior to
attending initial training, therefore, his discharge is
uncharacterized and he is ineligible receive a DD Form
214. Since there will be no DD Form 214 created, there will
also be no reenlistment code documented on a DD Form 214.
The complete DPTS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 23 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04295 in Executive Session on 10 Jun 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-04295 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Oct 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 18 Dec 14, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01466
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01466 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 27 Jul 03, the applicant was demobilized (released from active duty) and reverted to her traditional (part-time) status as a member of the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) based on his deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF). Service members must have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for 30 consecutive days or for 60 non-consecutive days or meet one of the following...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vermont Commendation Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05162
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05162 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of entry into the Air National Guard be corrected from 13 May 2014, to 14 May 2014 to reflect a one day break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a miscommunication between the Air National Guard and the recruiting office, his records were entered in error. We took notice of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02419
The applicants DD Form 214 reflects award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Air Force Good Conduct Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award - Air Force Longevity Service Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster - Air Force Training Ribbon The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02257
In accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Retired or separated personnel are not eligible to apply for correction through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); therefore, they must apply to the AFBCMR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03024
The applicant provided a copy of the certificate awarding him the MSM first OLC for his outstanding service for the period 15 Feb 10 through 27 Feb 14. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the...